But many aspiring PUAs don’t understand how attraction works for women, and thus make mistakes.

preselection dating-52preselection dating-51

The average man, based on the histogram, appears to have been rated at about 1.4 stars (out of 5) by women. If 100 viewers watch a television show and their ratings of it average 3.7 stars, on a 1-to-5 scale, that’s not a “good” rating. (Expert raters and critics are more conservative in their grading; a 3-star film, according to Ebert, is not being rated as mediocre.) And what is the average GPA at Ivy League colleges (where there are few poor students who must be given failing grades)? In any case, the graph of male ratings of women shows absolutely no inflation.

The distribution of attractiveness ratings seems to show a symmetric, bell-shaped curve.

So we all know how nerve racking and uncomfortable dating can be; the awkward wander over to meet them that seems to feel like your embarking on a climb up Mount Everest (Do you make eye contact? For example don't wear a ball gown to the bowling alley!

), the dreaded moment the bill lands on your table like a grenade with the cap pulled (Is it polite to offer to split it? ) and of course the uncomfortable goodbye (Do you hand shake? For example there are various different types of men: So that is pre-dating and pre-selection out of the way. As if you look like Angelina Jolie in the picture and turn up more like Susan Boyle this will only lead to an instant awkward disappointment and confusion on his end. These simple steps explain what turn ons and turn offs you need to be watching out for. I'm afraid we all do it, we do judge a book by its cover so dress to impress and dress to suit the occasion.

It is a bit like buying a car, there is far too much choice! Or do you want a reliable one, a good runner, with a few miles on the clock?

My guide on pre-dating: • Before you start dating, work out what you want.The real shocker is this: women on Ok Cupid have rated 80% of the men as unattractive, including four demonstrably average-looking men (Ok Cupid staff).It’s quite possible that this reflects only on the women who chose to give ratings– e.g. However, although it is far from a scientific analysis, this publication contradicts much of what society prefers to believe about women: that they are kind, less shallow than men, and relatively accepting of the average man’s appearance. A general rule in survey design is that ratings of anything will be inflated compared to the respondent’s actual opinion. A ubiquitious constant in such surveys is the “real average” of 4.3– a product rated below this by the public, on a 1-5 scale, is generally below-average. People seem to be much more candid when rating the physical attractiveness of strangers, so this rating inflation may not apply, but I’d still contend that a luke-warm rating– say, 3 stars– is not a good sign.In experiments that involved placing a female looking bird doll next to the male bird’s nest, the male birds with the dolls mated more frequently than their control counterparts without fake bird dolls.Even in humans, the use of a woman through paying her (extreme example) still implies resources to wealth and the social intelligence of setting up the arrangement.This is what we’d expect, and I posted on this matter in October.