This lack of knowledge was also a bit exciting because I got to roll up my sleeves and learn something new.

What I discovered was there are some key assumptions hidden in this research which makes some of the dates a little less concrete (pun intended) than you may be led to believe.

Radiometric dating can be compared to an hourglass.

radio carbon dating mt st helens-53

Each new false religion of the post-Flood period has sought to detract from our Creator and from our responsibilities in this life; evolution's effect is no different and it (macro-evolution) continues to lack any scientific substance.

And study as needed, especially since the media continues to report this issue inaccurately.

Being a born again Christian, I believe in a young earth This;"The mountain also provided a clear reason to distrust radioisotope dating.

Geologist Steve Austin sampled new rock from atop the mountain that formed in 1986.

In fact I knew nothing about radiometric dating and I must admit that learning about it seemed a bit intimidating.

I am also sure that this intimidation is what leads most people to just accept this type scientific statements as fact instead of taking a critical look at the process.

In essence, He gave us a “birth certificate.” For example, using a personal birth certificate, a person can calculate how old he is at any point.

Genesis 1 says that the earth was created on the first day of creation ().

I have written a number of articles under the series title: Answers to my Evolutionist Friends.

Each one is very carefully written so you can use it in your evangelistic conversations or to forward to your friends, etc.

Of course, the Bible doesn’t say explicitly anywhere, “The earth is 6,000 years old.” Good thing it doesn’t; otherwise it would be out of date the following year.